From: "Russell P.D. Burton" Add to Address Book
To: greensd@occ.washburn.edu
Subject: RE: [WU and Topeka Greens] State Meeting Update & City Council Ellection
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:44:40 -0600
Of course, who else???
Peace, Love, and Solidarity
Dr. RPDB
-----Original Message-----
From: greensd-admin@occ.washburn.edu
[mailto:greensd-admin@occ.washburn.edu]On Behalf Of Ryan Pratt
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:36 PM
To: greensd@occ.washburn.edu
Subject: Re: [WU and Topeka Greens] State Meeting Update & City Council
Ellection
Who are the progressive candidates exactly, the ones we are looking to
help?
-Ryan Pratt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell P.D. Burton"
To: "Peace@Postrockcountry. Com" ;
"Introsoc@Occ.
Washburn. Edu" ;
"hotpinkGARBAGE@yahoogroups.
com" ; "Greensd@Occ. Washburn. Edu"
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:17 AM
Subject: [WU and Topeka Greens] State Meeting Update & City Council
Ellection
> To all:
>
> Sorry I have been so late in responding to the list, however, I am
afraid that life and world events have gotten me a bit down and I have not
been able to do much of anything for the last few weeks...Yet, I am
striving to
> fight the good fight in spite of my twisted mind!!!!!
>
> Anyway, I am currently looking for the official minuets for the state
> meeting, which took place in Topeka the other week, to post on the
list
> (Ryan do you have a copy?)...The short version is that we will be
pressing
> on with the petition to officially get the Greens on the state
ballot...that
> is when we are successful we will be able to register as a Green in
the
> state of Kansas and run candidates without a petition.
>
> We will need about 20,000 signatures to get on the ballot...the drive
starts
> on the 15th of April and runs through the summer. We will have a
training
> session or two, in the next few weeks, for our group so that we can
make a
> meaningful contribution to this important state event!!! More to come
in
the
> next week or so.
>
> ALSO, please note that the Equal Justice Coalition has asked for our
help
in
> walking districts for progressive candidates THIS weekend (see note
below
my
> signature). Anyway, I hope that if you can find time, please respond
to
Ryan
> and offer your help...this one of the times that we are really called
to
> help and NEEDED to help.
>
> MOREOVER, Clark and Lisa and I have been in contact and they have
asked
> (knowing that we are supportive of progressive candidates) for our
help in
> any number of ways over the next few weeks!!!!! PLEASE let ME know if
you
> have even the smallest amount of time to help Clark, Lisa or the
other
> progressive candidates for the city council election. I will forward
our
> support to them and coordinate our efforts with them...WE NEED TO WIN
A
> MAJORITY IN THE CITY COUNCIL AND HERE IS HOW WE CAN REALLY
HELP!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Peace, Love, and Solidarity
>
> Dr. RPDB
>
>
> Hello all.
>
> My name is Ryan Freed - I am the Chair of the Elections Committee for
the
> Equal Justice Coalition (EJC). As you know, EJC is an organization
> determined to elect fair-minded leaders for the Topeka City council
in
order
> to pass progressive legislation to disallow discrimination on the
basis of
> sexual orientation or gender identity in the City of Topeka.
>
> To achieve our goal - we need volunteers, and LOTS of them!!!
>
> This weekend EJC will be walking the district for several city
council
> people, and we're looking for people to join us. We will be walking
Lisa
> Hecht's district and we will most likely be walking John Nave's as
well
> (John still has to get back to us). We need your help to do this.
If we
> are going to get fair-minded leaders in office, they need to have
their
> names out there. Door-to-door campaigning is the best way we can do
this.
>
> We will be walking from 10:00 - 2:00 on Saturday and Sunday (March 8
and
9).
> After the district walk on Sunday we will be having a phone bank to
get
> more volunteers for the next weekend to walk districts again. If you
are interested in joining EJC in walking districts, please email me at
> peacefulresolution@msn.com -or- wuamnesty@hotmail.com. You may
also call
> me if you have any questions.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you - thank you for your support.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Ryan Freed
> Chair - Elections Committee
> Equal Justice Coalition
> Ph: 233-8030
> Cell: 845-7624
>
-----Original Message-----
From: answer.general@action-mail.org
[mailto:answer.general@action-mail.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:04 PM
To: answer.general@action-mail.org
Subject: [ANSWER]: Denounce government ban on Feb. 15 Peace March in
NYC!
A.N.S.W.E.R. DENOUCES GOVERNMENT BAN ON FEBRUARY 15 PEACE
MARCH IN NEW YORK
A.N.S.W.E.R. denounces Federal Judge Barbara Jones's
refusal to grant a march permit for the huge February 15
peace march in New York City as a dangerous and
politically-motivated assault on the movement's most basic
right to freedom of speech and assembly.
The New York City Police claim that they won't allow the
march on Feb. 15 in New York because of security concerns.
For months the police have been routinely invoking
"security concerns" as a reason to deny march permits for
political demonstrations, large and small, but not for
other assemblies and huge parades that don't have a
political point of view in opposition to government
policies. The right to join together with thousands of
other individuals in common cause and march on our streets
is a unique and powerful form of political expression no
less important than speech, and it is fully protected by
the Constitution. We demand that the courts reject the
"security" pretext used to deny the march permit for Feb.
15, and to deny other marches.
The real reason that New York City Mayor Bloomberg, the
police and the courts are trying to ban the anti-war march
is because Feb. 15 is going to be a powerful international
day of protest against the war on Iraq and the United
States government. The security concerns they really have
are not a threat of "terrorism" but the threat posed to
Bush's political agenda. Fearful of the political impact
of the march the government is trying to suppress the
event.
The peace movement, along with everyone who is threatened
by this outrageous violation of the rights of protestors,
must fight the march ban. A.N.S.W.E.R. joins with all
other groups in fighting for and exercising our right to
march in New York on Feb. 15, and in any other city where
the antiwar movement chooses to take to the streets in
order to stop the war.
For all of those who are planning to join the many feeder
marches to the rally, we encourage everyone to stay strong
and defy the city and federal government's attempts to
discourage participation. The most important thing is that
people come out in large numbers to show the country and
the world that the people of the United States are
mobilizing in opposition to a war of aggression.
The court system, working in cahoots with the police and
the Bush administration, is attempting to discourage
people's efforts to exercise their First Amendment Right
on February 15. The best way, again, to oppose this is to
come to the demonstration.
The New York City demonstration on Saturday, February 15
will assemble on 1st Ave. starting at 49th St. and going
north. The permitted rally will begin at 12 noon.
---------------------------------------
FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT UPCOMING ACTIONS:
http://www.InternationalANSWER.org
http://www.VoteNoWar.org
dc@internationalanswer.org
New York 212-633-6646
Washington 202-544-3389
Los Angeles 213-487-2368
San Francisco 415-821-6545
To make a tax-deductible donation, go to
http://www.internationalanswer.org/donate.html
Sign up to receive updates (low volume):
http://www.internationalanswer.org/subscribelist.html
------------------
Send replies to answer@action-mail.org
This is the ANSWER activist announcement
list. Anyone can subscribe by sending
any message to
To unsubscribe
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:32:49 -0600
From: "Rhoda Vanderhart" Add to Address Book
To: "O'Conner, George" , "Oberhaus, Jean" , "Purtell, Keith" , "Ring, Stephanie" , "Rutledge, Kasia" , "Strelow, Justin" , "Suellentrop, Ann" , "Vogelweid, Anne"
CC: "Allison, Andy" , "Atkinson, Dennis" , "Beard, Christy" , "Bonilla, Robert" , "Burrows, Ryan" , "Callison, Herb" , "Cather, Bill" , "Corcoran, Shawn" , "Davis, Kate" , "Eib, Kevin" , "Enlow, Brad" , "Ensley, Jeff" , "Evans, Andrew" , "Goldy, Scott" , "Gurss, David" , "Hepner, Chris" , "Hummer, Jonathan"
Subject: KCK Nader Visit Next Week!!!!!!!!!
Greetings from Lawrence! I am proud to announce that Ralph Nader will
be visiting Kansas City, KS on Friday, June 23. Nader has decided to
achieve his goal of visiting all 50 states before the Denver
convention, and it looks like Kansas is the last (but not least) pit
stop.
To update some of you who are hearing this for the first time, Nader's
scheduling representative informed us today that he would like to visit
Kansas City, KS because it is close to MCI. Nader will be flying from
MCI to Denver at 4:15 on June 23. As for an exact arrival time, I
have
yet to receive a confirmation from DC. Gina Penn, who handles
scheduling, reviewed two possible incoming flights into MCI at
approximately 9:00 am and noon on June 23. Either way, she said we
should plan an event in Kansas City, KS from 12-3, which will consist
of
a rally with 4 or 5 local speakers and music, a speech by Ralph
Nader,and a press conference. Because this is Nader's 50th state,
campaign headquarters is pushing for nationalmedia coverage.
Wyandotte High School Auditorium is available on June 23, and it can
accommodate 1800 supporters for 5 hours for around $400. The
superintendent has "penciled us in" for that day, but the place is
notofficially ours to rent until I complete some paperwork tomorrow
andfind a way to pay for it. As soon as I have the "official" word,
feelfree to start working on flyers.
Rhoda and I suggest that we make this event a bit of a fundraiser. In
other words, if the two groups in Missouri and Kansas can cover the
initial cost, we can request donations at the door to reimburse our
organizations for this expense. We might consider reserving a
sectionin the front for petitioners and donors. Any ideas or
thoughts?
In any case, we will probably need the school from 11-4, which allows a
one-hour setup and cleanup buffer for a 12-3 PM event. As far as
speakers, I hope we can get Craig Volland to address our supporters
onbehalf of environmental concerns (thanks to Terry & Rhoda for this
suggestion). We also have the talent of a Lakota folk singer from
Lawrence named Natalie Cox. I had the pleasure of hearing her play
lastnight, and she would love to contribute 2 or 3 songs between
speakers. Rhoda suggested that we look into activists who can talk
about theWTO. Any ideas? And does anyone suggest someone who would
make a good mc for this?
No confirmation from DC yet as to when Nader will be flying in. As
Gina pointed out, he will be at our event by 1:30 at the latest.
Mostof his time beforehand will likely be spent with interviews. I
shouldknow in a couple days whether we will need to provide
transportationduring his visit.
There are several areas in which we can use all the help we can get:
Local Issues: One area in which the DC folks could really use our
helpis with providing resources on local environmental or social
issues. If anyone knows of any organizations, websites or other
resources,please email them to Jennifer in Washington, DC
jenthang@concentric.net.
Speakers: Ideally, we would like to schedule four or five 10-minute
speeches covering local angles on the following issues: labor,
environment, poverty, and indigenous rights. We have some great
leadson Native American speakers via Haskell Indian Nations University
in Lawrence and Adam Spak, who will be in contact with the Native
American elders on the Global Peace Walk. Also, we will be attending
the Juneteenth Parade on Saturday to scout potential
speakers who can represent the local African-American community.
Frank Neff had a good suggestion for Bill Onash to speak on behalf of
local labor concerns. And we have a lead on a Lawrence environmental
activist who specializes in water issues. If anyone has any
suggestions for local leaders who would like to support our cause,
please email their telephone numbers and any other information about
them. We also think it would be nice to recognize local petitioners
at the rally.
Publicity: As soon as we receive confirmation on a place and time, we
will create some flyers. Feel free to generate any type of flyer
thatcan help publicize this event. Also, suggestions for
opportunities
to publicize, such as the Global Peace Walk and the Juneteenth
Parade,would be especially helpful. Please update everyone involved
on
local happenings in the coming week.
Also concerning publicity, it would be helpful for people to contact
friends, fellow activists, and greens in neighboring states or
communities who might be attend or know others who would drive 3
hours to see Ralph. Please feel free to email any organizations that
wouldhelp publicize or support the event, as soon as the specifics
time
and place have been confirmed. (I will notify www.kcactivism.org and
all of their links.) As far as media are concerned, the campaign has
asked that we not contact media organizations.
They will be sending press releases to local media. Any names of
newspapers DC might overlook and their telephone & fax would be
helpful, and I will forward DC this information.
As far as the actual event, we will need representatives from the
counties in Kansas and Missouri to help man petition tables.
I would really like to extend thanks to the folks who provided the
great feed back today, namely Rhoda, Dee, Frank, Jerry, and Helen.
Please forward this message to your local greens and feel free to
callus (Nicole Jackel & Cy Routh) at home 785 842 4852 or email any
suggestions cyrouth@aol.com.
It's been wonderful working with you all and I know we can make
Ralph's 50th visit a national success!
Nicole Jackel and Cy Routh
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:40:06 -0400
From: "Nader 2000 Campaign" Add to Address Book
Subject: Action Alert: Democracy on Death Row
To: NEWSLETTER@LIST.VOTENADER.ORG
Dear Citizen Activist:
Our hard-work is starting to have an impact. The incredible turnout at
our
Super-Rallies, and the constant protests to Let Ralph Debate have
raised the
eyebrows of the establishment media who had declared our campaign dead
in
the water. We are also moving up in the polls. We are at 7% in
California,
9% in Maine, 7% in Connecticut, and an astounding 17% in Alaska.
We must now broaden our focus to include efforts that demonstrate our
strengths at the grassroots level. Simple things like wearing a Nader
Button, putting that bumper-sticker on your car, and helping distribute
literature in your neighborhood or putting up yardsigns will be
critical to
our success. Most people don't know that Ralph is in the campaign or
that
there is an alternative to the tired old politics as usual.
DIRECT ACTION MISSION: This week we need to protest that Texas
prisoners
aren't the only ones on death row, by excluding Ralph Nader from the
debates
the two parties are placing democracy on death row. Hold silent vigils,
mock
funeral processions, and show trials for the corrupt major party
candidates
who also support the death penalty, the drug war, and the for profit
prison
industry. These events can be held in front of your local Rep. or Dem.
office to highlight the placing of American democracy on death row.
Alert
local media, dress in black, build caskets, and put tape over your
mouths to
show that you've been silenced. Have fun, but always be polite and
peaceful.
OUTREACH MISSION: This week we need to reach out to local community
groups
that are holding candidate forums. You don't need to have public
speaking
experience to explain why the current political system isn't working
for
you. Two ideas that are important to express are : 1) That the campaign
finance system is corrupting the political system and the two major
parties
are marinating in corporate money. 2) If you are not in one of the half
dozen "battleground" states, a vote for Ralph Nader is not a wasted
vote.
The winner take all system of the electoral-college means that if Bush
is
going to win your state anyway a vote for Gore is a wasted vote. If
Gore is
going to win your state then a vote for Ralph Nader won't hurt and you
can
be free to vote your hopes and dreams instead of your fears.
FUNDRAISING MISSION: The Nader 2000 Campaign Needs You to Party!
With the election only 5 weeks away you may be wondering "What can I do
to
get involved in the Nader 2000 Campaign?" One great way to contribute
is to
raise funds and awareness about the campaign by throwing a campus or
neighborhood houseparty! Houseparties are small-scale
fundraiser/time-raisers held in homes, campuses, or community centers
by
folks who want to help spread the word about the only Presidential team
with
an authentic record of reform - Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke.
Houseparties
are a great way to get involved in the grassroots political process to
organize a truly progressive third party while having fun with your
friends,
family and co-workers.
During the month of October the campaign will be sponsoring a "Get Out
and
Vote-Houseparty Rally Contest". Between the dates of October 1-28, the
states that raise the most money, volunteers, and support, through
house-parties, will win a rally the weekend before the election hosted
by
one of our Citizen Committee Members.
For more information about hosting a house-party and contest
guidelines,
please visit our website:
http://www.votenader.org/materials/houseparty/
PRINT MISSION: The topic for this week's letter to the editor is the
connection between the failed war on drugs, the death penalty, and the
for-profit prison industry. Both major party candidates are supportive
of
these failed policies and are taking money from the prison industrial
complex. Some points to include:
* The War on Drugs:
Nader:
The War on Drugs unfairly targets people of color and the poor.
Drug abusers do not need to be incarcerated-they need opportunity and
treatment.
Opposes the criminalization of drugs, and the incarceration of
nonviolent
drug offenders.
Gore and Bush:
The Clinton-Gore Administration has shown little creativity in coming
up
with new approaches to drug problems.
Neither Gore nor Bush have shown any inclination or ability or the
courage
necessary to come up with new approaches that would reduce the drug
problem.
* The Death Penalty:
Nader:
Has opposed the death penalty since he was a law student at Harvard.
Opposes the death penalty because it does not deter and is
discriminatory
against people of color and those who cannot afford competent legal
counsel.
Supports moratorium on the death penalty
Bush:
Supports the death penalty.
Texas has one of the highest execution rates in the United States.
People of color are disproportionately represented on death row in
Texas.
Gore:
Supports the death penalty.
Has been silent on the injustices of the death penalty, such as the
disproportionate representation of people of color on death row.
* Prison Industrial Complex:
Nader:
Calls for corporations, such as the Corrections Corporation of
America-the
largest multinational prison corporation operating in the United
States-to
get out of the prison industry; human dignity should come before
profits.
Corporations wrongfully exploit prisoners, who are disproportionately
people
of color. Prisoners are used as cheap labor to increase corporate
profits.
He believes that public policy should be aimed at reducing the
incarceration
rate through treatment and rehabilitation-not locking people up by the
masses.
Bush and Gore:
Both encourage the growth of the corporate prison industry.
Both have accepted more than $100,000 in soft money that corporations
running for-profit prisons have given to both the DNC and RNC.
The corporate-prison industry has grown tremendously under the eight
years
of the Clinton administration, particularly in George W. Bush's state
of
Texas.
From: "Russell P.D. Burton" Add to Address Book
To: "Peace@Postrockcountry. Com" , "Greensd@Occ. Washburn. Edu"
Subject: [WU and Topeka Greens] FW: [Kansas-Greens] Reads like extortion
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:07:30 -0600
;;;;;;
Peace, Love, and Solidarity
Dr. RPDB
-----Original Message-----
From: kansas-list-admin@kansasgreens.org
[mailto:kansas-list-admin@kansasgreens.org]On Behalf Of Richard Heckler
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:50 PM
To: kansas-list@kansasgreens.org; kawgreens@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Kansas-Greens] Reads like extortion
A threat on eve of U.N. vote
02/24/03
Dafna Linzer
Associated Press
United Nations- Senior U.S. officials have been
quietly dispatched in recent days to the capitals of
key Security Council countries where they are warning
leaders to vote with the United States on Iraq or risk
"paying a heavy price."
For some of the countries, such as Angola, Guinea and
Cameroon - poor African nations whose concerns drew
little attention before they landed seats on the
council - there is the possibility that supporting
Washington's drive for a new U.N. resolution
authorizing war may reap benefits down the line.
From Our Advertiser
"For a long time now, we have been asking for help to
rebuild our country after years of war," said Angolan
Ambassador Ismael Gaspar Martins. "No one is tying the
request to support on Iraq but it is all happening at
the same time."
Angola's president, Jose Eduardo dos Santos, met in
Luanda Thursday with U.S. Assistant Secretary of State
Walter Kansteiner, who was diverted from a trip to
South Africa to meet with the leaders of the council's
three African nations.
"In Africa, the message is simple: Time is running out
and we think they should support us," said one U.S.
diplomat on condition of anonymity.
The United States and Britain plan to submit their
resolution to the Security Council this week and will
ask for a vote by the middle of March.
In the meantime, the State Department has sent some of
its top people to the world's capitals to lobby for
support even as President Bush, Secretary of State
Colin Powell and British Prime Minister Tony Blair
work the phones. The Bush administration has also
recruited the leaders of Australia and Spain to help
push for votes.
"The order from the White House was to use 'all
diplomatic means necessary,' " another U.S. diplomat
said. "And that really means everything."
In the past three weeks, the administration has sent
Undersecretary of State Marc Grossman and Kim Holmes,
the assistant secretary of state for international
organizations, to Mexico City.
Mexican diplomats described the visits as hostile in
tone and complained that Washington was demonstrating
little concern for the constraints of the Mexican
government, whose people are overwhelmingly opposed to
a war with Iraq.
"They actually told us: 'Any country that doesn't go
along with us will be paying a very heavy price,' "
said one Mexican diplomat.
To get its resolution through, the United States must
secure nine votes in the 15-member council while
preventing France, Russia or China - which are pushing
for continued weapons inspections - from using their
vetoes. The United States and Britain hold the two
other vetoes.
While Washington and London believe they already have
the necessary authorization to forcefully disarm Iraq,
many key allies - Turkey included - have said a new
resolution would help them overcome opposition at
home.
But so far, Washington is at least five votes short
with support guaranteed only from Britain, Spain and
Bulgaria.
Since both Germany and Syria have said they would not
support the resolution, and Pakistan is almost certain
to abstain, the United States must persuade the
African trio as well as Chile and Mexico to vote yes.
Otherwise, the resolution will fail.
Diplomats said there was little the Bush
administration could use to scare or entice Mexico now
since it does not receive U.S. aid and the one thing
it had wanted most - legalizing the status of
undocumented Mexicans in the United States - was taken
off the table more than a year ago.
) 2003 The Plain Dealer. Used with permission.
__________________________________________________
From: "Russell P.D. Burton" Add to Address Book
To: "Socio-Majors@Occ. Washburn. Edu" , "Greensd@Occ. Washburn. Edu"
Subject: WU Greens Discussion ListFW: [REDYOUTH] CALIFORNIA VOTERS ROUT RACISM
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:34:19 -0500
Peace, Love and Solidarity
Dr. RPDB
-----Original Message-----
From: William Mandel [mailto:wmmmandel@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 2:08 AM
To: anarch3m
Subject: [REDYOUTH] CALIFORNIA VOTERS ROUT RACISM
The most important result of the California election was the
two-to-one
vote against racism, by defeating Proposition 54, which would have
prevented the state from collecting information on differences by
ethnicity in education, employment, housing, health, or anything else.
That margin is, by electoral standards, not a landslide but an
avalanche.
This vote is a sea change. Less than a decade ago, the voters passed
a proposition, by the same man, prohibiting affirmative action. Most
encouraging, A majority of whites voted against Prop. 54 on Tuesday, as
well as, of course, Latinos and Blacks.
The election of Schwarzenegger, who won by a plurality, not even a
majority, was fundamentally a vote against
politicians. How can one run a democracy without them? Democracy is
based on compromise, and that is the skill that makes a competent
politician. The answer would seem to be reforming the Democratic Party,
if that is possible, to reflect the views of presidential candidates
Kucinich and Sharpton instead of the oil, computer, and financial
oligarchs. Another answer is to win major-party status, in
the eyes of voters, for a presently minor party. A third answer is to
establish a new one, as was the case when the Republican Party was
founded just one presidential election before Lincoln, running as its
candidate, won.
The under-three-percent vote for the Green candidate in California,
and the only slightly larger combined poll showings of Kucinich plus
Sharpton provide no reason to hope for any of these changes in the
situation as it now exists.
Two things can change that. One would be ultimate defeat in Iraq as
occurred in Iran, which is not just around the corner.
There is another. Foreign investors now fund the operation of the
U.S. government by purchase of its bonds, because Bush has substituted
an unprecedented deficit for the previous surplus. Asia, very largely
China, alone holds 600 BILLION in such paper. Any time those investors
conclude that our deficit is too large for us to be a safe investment,
they will shift their money to where it is safer. That always happens
in accelerating panic mode. If and when that occurs, the bottom will drop
out of the U.S. economy overnight, as I well remember from the Great
Depression. Under those circumstances, everything in politics will be
up
for grabs.
William Mandel
========================================================
The title of my autobiography, SAYING NO TO POWER (Introduction by
Howard Zinn), is based on my demolition of Sen. Joe McCarthy and later
of HUAC in hearings of 1953 and 1960. It is a history of how the
American people fought to defend and expand its rights since the 1920s
(I'm 86) employing the form of the life of a 30s AND 60s activist, one
who was involved in most serious movements: student, labor, 45 years of
efforts to prevent war with the USSR and Cuba, civil rights South and
North, women's liberation [my late wife appears on 50 pages], 37 years
on Pacifica Radio [where I reinvented talk radio, of whose previous
existence I had been unaware], civil liberties, and opposition to
anti-Semitism and to Zionism. You may hear/see my testimonies before
McCarthy and, later, HUAC on my website, http://www.billmandel.net I
am the author of five books in my academic field, have taught at UC
Berkeley, and earlier held a postdoctoral fellowship, by invitation, at
Stanford's Hoover Institution.
The book may be ordered through all normal sources. For an autographed
copy, send me $24 at 4466 View Pl.,#106, Oakland, CA. 94611
========================================================
--
Red Youth is a mailing list sponsored by the Young People's Socialist
League. To unsubscribe, send email to redyouth-request@ypsl.org with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject line.